New report: is there enough time?
Photo:
Uppsala Student Union publishes today the report: Is time enough? on supervisory time in master's programmes in the humanities and social sciences, for which Uppsala Student Union has the status of a union. The report shows that the difference in supervision time within a single faculty is between 12 and 45 hours, and indicates that the average difference between faculties is also large. Uppsala Student Union argues that this is ultimately a question of an unequal distribution of resources between programmes both within faculties and within the field as a whole.
The financial conditions for higher education have been deteriorating for a long time. The costs of education have steadily increased while the remuneration has not increased to the same extent, which can be linked to the low remuneration amounts for the humanities and social sciences. Uppsala Student Union wants to see long-term investments by increasing the remuneration amounts, but we will also continue to push for a fairer distribution of resources between different areas of education and are concerned about how students are affected by the lack of supervision time.
In the report, Uppsala Student Union can show that students in the Master's programme in Peace and Conflict Studies have only 12 hours of supervision time for their Master's thesis, while the Master's programme in Psychology at the same faculty has a full 45 hours for the corresponding thesis work.
In addition to the lack of supervision time, students face the problem that their supervisors have insufficient knowledge of the chosen theories and methods. At the same time, survey responses from the directors of studies indicate that common problems in tutoring are students' gainful employment alongside their studies, lack of subject knowledge and lack of knowledge of the chosen methodology. The report also shows that the decision to extend tutoring time is often left to the individual tutor to decide whether it is possible to extend tutoring time. This leaves individual students in a bind and dependent on the goodwill of their supervisor. Uppsala Student Union wants to see an increase in supervision time for those programmes that have less than 1 supervision hour per credit and wants this to be a minimum for Masters programmes.
Furthermore, the report shows that many of the programmes lack guidelines that follow the content that the students' working conditions state the guidelines should contain, leaving students without the information they need to write their work. Uppsala Student Union wants all Master's programmes to have guidelines that follow the students' working conditions, and that the guidelines should be decided by either the Faculty Board or the Departmental Board to ensure student involvement in the development of the guidelines.
Want to know more about the report? Come to our panel discussion on 8 February at 14.15-16.00 in the Betty Petterssonsaal at Blåsenhus! We will present the report and discuss the content and ways forward with representatives from the university and the union.
The full report is available here.
If you have any questions about the work on the report or its content, please contact the Uppsala Student Union's faculty coordinators and report authors Klara Fröberg and Klara van Blaricum at: fakultetssamordnare@uskar.se
More posts
Report release: What does it make you?
Today Uppsala Student Union releases the report "What will you be then?", a report on labor market attachment for students in the humanities and theology. The report aims to highlight the need to strengthen the work with labor market attachment for humanities and theology students. The Uppsala Student Union hopes that the report will revive the issue of labor market integration in humanities and theology programs at Uppsala University.
Report release: Do the placement guidelines need to be re-plastered?
Uppsala Student Union today released a report on the clinical placement guidelines at the Faculty of Medicine. The purpose of the report is to present the guidelines and reimbursement models used by different programs at the Faculty of Medicine at Uppsala University in the management of costs that may arise for students in connection with their clinical training. This refers, for example, to travel costs and costs for accommodation when students have a clinical placement in a location other than Uppsala. Uppsala Student Union hopes that the report will contribute to a continued discussion on the conditions for equal and inclusive higher education in Sweden. Such a discussion is an important step in the work to ensure that anyone with the right qualifications has the opportunity to study, regardless of socio-economic background.