In the fall of 2025 and spring of 2026, it is time for the dietetics program at the University of Gothenburg to undergo an external evaluation. This review is part of the university's quality system and serves as a follow-up of the internal quality work. According to GU's guidelines, each assessment group should include a student representative from another university in the same field of study. We would therefore be grateful if you are able to help us find a suitable student representative for this evaluation. remuneration- The student will be reimbursed for travel and accommodation and will be paid SEK 6,000 for their contribution. Number of meetings/inputs? - A site visit lunch to lunch on May 7-8 in Gothenburg. The work will start up in the fall and run low-intensity until the site visit. The work includes some reading of material that takes place at any time. After the site visit, there will be a few hours of work to summarize. In addition, a number of digital meetings, time for these is not yet planned. What educational background should the students have? - Ideally, it should be students from the dietetics program. Please note that your application will be handled by the Sahlgrenska Academy Student Union (SAKS) who will fill the position. This means that your application, and email address will be sent to SAKS.

The evaluation includes a self-evaluation by the institution, written evidence such as syllabi, curricula, course evaluations and examination data, and general education data. A crucial part is then the external review by a panel of 'critical peers'. Based on your role as a student, we would be very grateful if you could help us by being one of the external reviewers for the evaluation of these programs in spring 2026. The review panel will visit the Department of Theology and the selected programs in spring 2026. You will need to be on site either 7-9 or 13-15 April. The schedule for the visit is not clear, but the ambition is to free up time for the assessment panel to start working on the statement already in Uppsala. After the visit, a summary assessment statement will be prepared and submitted to the Faculty of Theology on June 1, 2026. Seeking a student who is not studying at the Faculty of Theology.

As a student representative, you will be involved in reviewing the programs' current situation analyses, i.e. self-evaluations with a particular focus on students. You will also participate in a digital site visit for each program, three in total. In the assignment, you will also be involved in producing an assessment statement and participate in a quality dialog. Please note that this student representative assignment is at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), your application will therefore be handed over to SLUSS - SLU's collective student unions, which selects the student representative for the assignment.

As a student representative, you will be involved in reviewing the programs' current situation analyses, i.e. self-evaluations with a particular focus on students. You will also participate in a digital site visit for each program, three in total. In the assignment, you will also be involved in producing an assessment statement and participate in a quality dialog. Please note that this student representative assignment is at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), your application will therefore be handed over to SLUSS - SLU's collective student unions, which selects the student representative for the assignment.

As a student representative, you will be involved in reviewing the programs' current situation analyses, i.e. self-evaluations with a particular focus on students. You will also participate in a digital site visit for each program, three in total. In the assignment, you will also be involved in producing an assessment statement and participate in a quality dialog. Please note that this student representative assignment is at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), your application will therefore be handed over to SLUSS - SLU's collective student unions, which selects the student representative for the assignment.

In 2026, the supplementary training for pharmacists with foreign degrees, Uppsala University, will be evaluated. The strengths and development opportunities of the program will be summarized in the form of a self-evaluation. An assessment group will review the data and make suggestions for quality-enhancing measures that can be introduced in the coming years. We are looking for an active student from another faculty/science area/university for the evaluation work. The work includes reading the program's self-evaluation with associated appendices, participating in meetings with other members of the assessment group (teachers from UU, other universities / colleges and representatives from the professional world), participating in the site visit that will tentatively take place in May 2026, and participating in the production of an assessment report after the visit. The total effort is estimated to be 4-5 days during May 2026. A fee of SEK 5 000 will be paid.

The faculty's election committee is preparing the election of dean, vice-dean and faculty board planned to be carried out in April / May 2026, but the election committee's work on producing proposals for candidates will begin shortly. The work of the nomination committee will be different for each committee, but the work will partly be about determining what type of faculty management is desirable both internally at the faculty but also in relation to other faculties and the other scientific areas. The nomination committee will develop proposals for candidates that the college may support, and find candidates who may be willing to take on the assignment.

The three program self-assessments will be sent to the respective assessment team in early February 2026, so that the assessors can read them and think about what they would like to ask about/get clarification on during the site visit. The site visit (2.5-3 days) is planned for the end of April. There may be a preparatory online meeting for the assessment team beforehand, if the chair of the team thinks it is appropriate. During the site visit, the assessment group will meet program managers, teachers and students, and there will also be time for the assessment group to sit and start writing the three assessment reports. Not everything will be done during the site visit, so there will probably be correspondence about the reports afterwards. Maybe some digital meeting if it is considered appropriate. The end of June is the deadline to submit the assessment reports. Should be a student from a laboratory program, but not from the medical faculty.

The three program self-assessments will be sent to the respective assessment team in early February 2026, so that the assessors can read them and think about what they would like to ask about/get clarification on during the site visit. The site visit (2.5-3 days) is planned for the end of April. There may be a preparatory online meeting for the assessment team beforehand, if the chair of the team thinks it is appropriate. During the site visit, the assessment group will meet program managers, teachers and students, and there will also be time for the assessment group to sit and start writing the three assessment reports. Not everything will be done during the site visit, so there will probably be correspondence about the reports afterwards. Maybe some digital meeting if it is considered appropriate. The end of June is the deadline to submit the assessment reports. Should be a student from a laboratory program, but not from the medical faculty.

The three program self-assessments will be sent to the respective assessment team in early February 2026, so that the assessors can read them and think about what they would like to ask about/get clarification on during the site visit. The site visit (2.5-3 days) is planned for the end of April. There may be a preparatory online meeting for the assessment team beforehand, if the chair of the team thinks it is appropriate. During the site visit, the assessment group will meet program managers, teachers and students, and there will also be time for the assessment group to sit and start writing the three assessment reports. Not everything will be done during the site visit, so there will probably be correspondence about the reports afterwards. Maybe some digital meeting if it is considered appropriate. The end of June is the deadline to submit the assessment reports. Should be a student from a laboratory program, but not from the medical faculty.