The nomination committee prepares for the election of the head of department and the department board.

The Center for Women's Mental Health is an interdisciplinary center for coordinating and focusing the university's broad expertise from all scientific fields with the aim of understanding, preventing, and treating the increasing mental ill health among women. The Center for Women's Mental Health – Women's Mental Health during the Reproductive Lifespan, WOMHER, was established with the overall goal of generating evidence-based knowledge that can form the basis for strategic decisions in working life and society.

In 2026, the Midwifery Program at Uppsala University will be evaluated. The program's strengths and development opportunities will be summarized in the form of a self-assessment. An evaluation group will review the documentation and make suggestions for quality-enhancing measures that can be introduced in the coming years. We are looking for an active student to participate in the evaluation work. The work includes reading the program's self-evaluation and accompanying appendices, participating in meetings with other members of the assessment group (teachers from Uppsala University, other universities/colleges, and representatives from the professional world), participating in the site visit (2 days in September/October), and participating in the preparation of an assessment report after the visit. The total time commitment is estimated to be 4-5 days in 2026. Compensation of SEK 5,000 will be paid. Does this sound interesting? Apply for the assignment if you want to be part of and contribute to this quality-enhancing work. It is a great opportunity to network with stakeholders, gain insight into and experience of quality work within the university, and it will add some valuable lines to your CV that could be decisive for future job applications.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas at advanced level in 2026. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then carry out a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the evaluation panel interviews different categories of the institution (programme managers, teachers, supervisors, students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the strengths, weaknesses/development areas of the program and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.