The psychology program's evaluation is part of a national evaluation of all psychology programs according to directives from UKÄ. May also be relevant to be part of a student group interviewed by a national panel that evaluates all psychology programs. Looking for student representatives from the psychology program preferably from T7 and up, at least from T3. Estimated work effort is approximately 20-40 hours.

The student representative will, together with a panel of two experts, evaluate the Master's Program in Russian and Eurasian Studies. The panel will be provided with the department's self-evaluation and other documentation well in advance of the planned panel visit (approximately 1-2 months before the visit). The panel visit will take place on September 15-16, 2025 and it will be on site in Uppsala. The first day will be dedicated to interviews with teachers and students at the institution. On the second day, the panel will start writing their assessment report and participate in a final discussion. Please note that the student representative should NOT study at the Faculty of Social Sciences.

The student representatives, together with a panel of four experts, will evaluate the Department of Informatics and Media's educational environment. The panel will be provided with the department's self-evaluation and other documentation well in advance of the planned panel visit (approximately 1-2 months before the visit). The panel visit will take place on December 1-3, 2025 and will be on site in Uppsala. The first day is dedicated to interviews with faculty and students at the institution. Day two will be devoted to starting the writing of the report. On the morning of day three, there will be a seminar where the panel will present and discuss their preliminary conclusions to representatives of the department and the faculty. The panel's work will then conclude with the submission of their final report approximately two weeks later. The student representatives should NOT study at the Faculty of Social Sciences.

The Faculty's working group for new Goals and Strategies 2026-2030 is appointed by the Faculty of Theology Board and consists of the dean, the vice-dean, the head of department, the director of studies for postgraduate education, the head of education, a student representative and a doctoral student representative. The student representative should have at least two semesters' experience of studying religious studies at the Faculty of Theology, preferably with experience of student representative assignments.

The Student Council is a complement to course evaluations. Student Councils are organized twice a semester or on request and are a chance for students to ventilate and discuss thoughts and opinions about the course. Student Council representatives collect thoughts and opinions from their fellow students on the course and program. Student Council representatives are students of the course or program. Present at meetings are student council representatives and the director of studies. Looking for student representatives for year 2 of the Master's program in Gender Studies and the courses: Feminist Cultural Studies, Humans, Animals, Environments, Globalization, Race, Privileges and Family, Kinship, Reproduction

The Student Council is a complement to course evaluations. Study Councils are organized twice a semester or on request and are a chance for students to ventilate and discuss thoughts and opinions about the course. Student Council representatives collect thoughts and opinions from their fellow students on the course. Student Council representatives are students on the course. Present at meetings are student council representatives, teachers and the director of studies.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas in the fall of 2025. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then conduct a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the assessment panel interviews different categories at the institution (education officers, teachers, supervisors, students/doctoral students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the program's strengths, weaknesses/development areas and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

Faculty of Arts conducts educational evaluations of the faculty's main areas in the fall of 2025. The educational evaluations are carried out by an assessment panel consisting of four people, including a student representative, who read the self-evaluation and other relevant material produced by the department, and then conduct a site visit. The evaluation is based on the self-evaluation written by the institutions and oral exchanges during the site visit. In addition, the assessment panel interviews different categories at the institution (education officers, teachers, supervisors, students/doctoral students, course administrators). Within two weeks after the the site visit, the assessment panel delivers a written summary assessment statement. According to the guidelines, this should include a statement of the program's strengths, weaknesses/development areas and recommendations. We are looking for a student representative to the assessment panel who is not studying the main field of study, or at the same institution.

The reference group will evaluate the framework syllabus for subject didactics in the subject teacher program starting VT 2025. The purpose of the assignment is to evaluate the current framework curriculum for subject didactics and propose any adjustments to it. We are now looking for two regular student representatives to the reference group.

During the academic year 25/26, the Biomedicine program at Uppsala University will be evaluated. We will write a self-evaluation during vt25 which will be sent to an assessment group consisting of UU internal assessors, external assessors and students. This will be followed up with a two-day site visit in October 2025. During and after the site visit, the assessment group will write a report that must be completed before the end of the year 25/26. Looking for a representative who, together with teacher representatives, can be part of the assessment group. The student should be familiar with quality work of education and should attend another program at UU than the biomedicine program. A compensation of SEK 5,000 will be paid.